Share |
Integrating Perspectives

Where there are multiple people there are multiple perspectives.  For a team working towards some aim, integrating diverse views provides a more accurate and complete map of reality, allowing more informed decisions and better navigation of the territory ahead.  Yet, on most teams, critical perspectives are often ignored or dismissed when they’re not shared by the leader or by the majority – it’s like flying an airplane and ignoring the fuel gauge just because other instruments don’t report a problem. When people tune into different information in service of the team’s aim, there is significant value in integrating their views.

At the same time, attempting to integrate every perspective of every team member into every decision would be just as dysfunctional as outvoting the fuel gauge.  Most decisions faced day-to-day are relatively simple and pose minimal risk – they are most effectively made by one person autocratically.  Always seeking consensus would be a crippling waste of time, and a recipe for ego to take over and dominate the organization’s broader purpose.  Thus, there is also significant value in delegating autocratic authority to an individual and deferring to their best judgment rather than using an integrative process.  The challenge lies in determining when to use each.

Governance vs. OperationsTo address these seeming contradictions, we make a distinction in Holacracy between governance and operations.  Governance is about how a team will structure itself and work together to achieve its aim – it’s about roles, accountabilities, policies, and processes. Governance decisions use Holacracy’s Integrative Decision-Making™ process to give everyone a voice and rapidly integrate multiple perspectives.  However, this group process isn’t used to resolve tactical issues or to make specific operational decisions in the normal course of business.  Integrative decision-making in Holacracy defines space for autocratic control and individual action in specific areas, along with appropriate boundaries on such control, so that execution can happen safely and swiftly without the need for a whole-group process.  Whenever this delegation of authority needs updating, the team falls back on the integrative process to update its governance.

If you liked this post, share it:

Share |

Comments

I fully agree with this necessary dusctinction between Governance & Operations.

I am now interesed to listnen to you about the "strategy" part of the circle you have drawn.

Regards

Bernard Marie CHIQUET

The use of different decision making practices for different types of decisions is crucial - yet so often overlooked.

Allowing the integrative solution to emerge when establishing behavior patterns and structure makes so much sense. And the energy it frees up for rapid individual action is amazing! We can finally do what needs to be done without worrying "what he or she will think".

Evan

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

About the Author

Brian Robertson

Brian is an experienced entrepreneur, CEO, and organizational pioneer. His work with Holacracy™ has found international support within both the conventional business world and cutting-edge movements and thought-leaders.
 
 

Connect with Us

 Follow HolacracyOne on Twitter  Find HolacracyOne on FaceBook  Subscribe to HolacracyOne's Feeds  Get Connected - Join our Mailing List
 

Join Our Mailing List

Receive updates about Holacracy-related content, events, and news.
 

Next Free Live Webinar

Mar
6
Mar 06, 2012 at 12:00pm - 1:30pm EST
Permission to share, publish, or distribute this blog post is granted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States license. For details or for a summary of key terms, please see this page.
Creative Commons License
Holacracy and Beyond